> On 07 Apr 2017, at 14:03, Ben Peart <peart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do a mechanical rename of the functions that will become the reusable
> sub-process module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Peart <benpe...@microsoft.com>
> ---
> convert.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/convert.c b/convert.c
> index 747c0c363b..235a6a5279 100644
> --- a/convert.c
> +++ b/convert.c
> @@ -507,8 +507,8 @@ struct cmd2process {
> unsigned int supported_capabilities;
> };
>
> ...
>
> -static void kill_multi_file_filter(struct subprocess_entry *entry)
> +static void subprocess_stop(struct subprocess_entry *entry)
> {
> if (!entry)
> return;
> @@ -561,14 +561,14 @@ static void kill_multi_file_filter(struct
> subprocess_entry *entry)
> kill(entry->process.pid, SIGTERM);
> finish_command(&entry->process);
>
> - hashmap_remove(&cmd_process_map, entry, NULL);
> + hashmap_remove(&subprocess_map, entry, NULL);
> free(entry);
> }
> ...
> @@ -777,7 +777,8 @@ static int apply_multi_file_filter(const char *path,
> const char *src, size_t len
> * Force shutdown and restart if another blob requires
> filtering.
> */
> error("external filter '%s' failed", cmd);
> - kill_multi_file_filter((struct subprocess_entry
> *)entry);
> + subprocess_stop((struct subprocess_entry *)entry);
> + free(entry);
I think we perform a double "free" here and in subprocess_stop(), no?
Everything else looks good to me!
Thanks,
Lars
