Hi Junio,

On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> IOW, "give an escape hatch to override auto-detected tortoiseplink and
> plink variables" suggestion should be taken as an "in addition to"
> suggestion (as opposed to an "instead of" suggestion).  I was not clear
> in my very first message, and I thought in my second and my third
> message I clarified it as such, but probably I wasn't explicit enough.

While you may not have been explicit enough, I was not smart enough.

That escape-hatch exists *already*. And it is exactly the thing that you
mentioned earlier as a potential source of mis-identification.

Let's assume that you want to use a script for the GIT_SSH_COMMAND that
eventually uses PuTTY, and you call this script "junio-is-a-superstar.sh".
All plausible so far ;-)

Now, with the patch in question (without the follow-up, which I would like
to ask you to ignore, just like you did so far), Git would not figure out
that your script calls PuTTY eventually. The work-around? Easy:

        DUMMY=/plink.exe /path/to/junio-is-a-superstar.sh

In other words: the thing that we thought may be a problem is actually a
feature.

Likewise, if your GIT_SSH_COMMAND looks like this:

        THIS_IS_NOT_ACTUALLY_PUTTY=/my/window/needs/putty my-ssh.sh

... you can easily change Git's mind by prefixing

        DUMMY=blubber

If you want to use a script that decides itself whether to call OpenSSH or
PuTTY, Git should "stay dumb" about it, as it will not be able to tell
beforehand whether a port argument should be passed via `-p` or `-P`
anyway.

Of course, given our discussion I think all of this should be documented
in the commit message as well as in the man page.

Do you agree this is a good direction to take?

Ciao,
Johannes

Reply via email to