From: "Junio C Hamano" <[email protected]>
"Philip Oakley" <[email protected]> writes:
micro-nit: 'first' and 'last' can be tricky to distinguish for lists...
Let's do this then.
Looks good to me. Thanks. -- Philip
-- >8 --
From: Pranit Bauva <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:44:09 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] rev-list-options: clarify the usage of --reverse
Users often wonder if the oldest or the newest n commits are shown
by `log -n --reverse`. Clarify that --reverse kicks in only after
deciding which commits are to be shown to unconfuse them.
Reported-by: Ruediger Meier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
index 4f009d4..f8946d4 100644
--- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
+++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
@@ -638,8 +638,9 @@ avoid showing the commits from two parallel
development track mixed
together.
--reverse::
- Output the commits in reverse order.
- Cannot be combined with `--walk-reflogs`.
+ Output the commits chosen to be shown (see Commit Limiting
+ section above) in reverse order. Cannot be combined with
+ `--walk-reflogs`.
Object Traversal
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.10.0-561-g98a6b79
