On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think "fetch" is more applicable to what they do.
>
> OK. then they are git-http-fetch and friends. How about
> git-ssh-push? The counterpart of fetch-pack/clone-pack is
> called upload-pack, so would git-ssh-upload make things more
> consistent? I dunno.
I like that idea.
> > I don't think it matters very much whether something is a script or not;
> > on the other hand, it would be good to have "git" list a reasonable set of
> > commands to use through the interface, which would exclude, for example,
> > git-merge-one-file-script, and include the above commands.
>
> Are you suggesting to drop -script from git-merge-one-file?
> Then git-cherry should perhaps keep its current name.
I'd suggest it get a different ending, like .sh or -helper. That way, it's
distinct both from binaries and from scripts that people run directly.
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
