Thank you everyone for your responses. I tried to manage git repositories with a size of 3.3 GB and it happened to me what Mark Waite said, as more space was occupied more slower was the management of the repository. On the other hand, to clarify my conditions as you said Konstantin Khomoutov, I am using Git for Windows. I cannot understand that Git for Windows has a practical limit of 2GB on the size of the objects Git is able to manipulate in memory, because I was able to do commits and checkouts with 3.3 GB.
Le mercredi 27 décembre 2017 09:08:07 UTC+1, [email protected] a écrit : > > Hello everyone, > > I am trying to find some official information about the limit size of a > repository. As I have read git has a limitation of 2GB for each repo > because if you increment the size it starts to decrease the overall > performance. But this limitation is mainly explained in the web based > servers like GitHub or Bitbucket Cloud. So my main question is if this also > happens *when you use a self hosted server* like Bitbucket Server or > GitHub enterprise. However, what I am trying to find is official > documentation that explains this. > > Greetings > > Antonio > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
