On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:26:15 +0300
Konstantin Khomoutov <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 09:54:30 -0800
> Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > So, the question of "which form to use on windows" depends if you
> > are using git for windows with the normal windows shell, or if you
> > are using git for windows with cygwin and the bash shell?
> 
> Sounds about correct.  "Native" Windows shells should pass wildcards
> to Git commands unmodified, and Git will take care of their
> expansions by itself.

Well, there's yet one more point I forgot to formulate while having it
on my mind actually.  Since Windows port of Git _has to_ deal with the
fact Windows shells don't expand fileglobs, it definitely has some
layer which deals with command-line processing.  A possible issue is
that GfW uses MinGW to compile its core components (written in C), and
MinGW should supposedly have some means to make non-Windows programs
being ported on Windows "feel at home" with regard to parsing
commad-line arguments.  Hence there might be some layer provided by
MinGW which deals with fileglobs before core Git code has a chance to
get its hands on them.  I don't know for sure how exactly this is
currently implemented, so I'd ask on the GfW's mailing list for details.

[...]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to