I'd argue that one is the fault of Backpack itself: it's inherently GHC-specific and was intended to be used with tooling (that is, Cabal). It really needed to be a language feature instead of a tooling hack, IMO.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 11:19 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:35:45AM +0900, Moritz Angermann via ghc-devs > wrote: > > I think this highlights another point where cabal is _way_ too tightly > > coupled with the haskell compiler. > > Another example might be the apparently-tight coupling between Backpack > and Cabal. > > Cheers, > Tom > > > -- brandon s allbery kf8nh [email protected]
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
