Am Freitag, 30. November 2012, 02:14:07 schrieb David Kuehling: > > I only changed the way the engine is called, and that boot calls now > > (bye). I've now changed that to -56 (QUIT throwcode), and also return > > the other throw-codes if the startup code fails for some reason. > > Wherever you canged that, maybe you didn't change it in Gforth CVS (yet)? > Because after updating, I still have the same problems.
No, so far only in my experimental branch. > BTW does that mean (bye) is not going to be able to return all exit > codes? That's somehow a nuisance, I currently cannot think of a > programming language that *doesn't* support arbitrary exit codes (apart > from, now obviously, Gforth). Maybe the engine needs to return more > bits than just an int? Or just add a primitive that does an explicit > exit(n) exit() only returns a byte. If you say $101 (bye), it will give an exit code of 1. Now, with the change to proceed to QUIT with -56 (bye), you can simply return 1 again. > > Subversion is deeply directory-based. And I had my fair share of > > problems with it. IMHO it's a good thing we skipped it for Gforth > > ;-). > > Then let's do it, just in time before the flamewar hits :) I wonder what > Anton thinks. I've already discussed with him at EuroForth. The open question is: Hosting at TU Wien or using Savannah? The good thing of a Git repository is that moving it elsewhere is a piece of cake, as everybody has the full repository local, anyways. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
