Hiya,

Thnx for your feedback. Indeed, we're working with the Mapbox vector tile format. Will investigate further whether the client library is actually requesting the tiles at the wrong resolution. Buildings are losing their right angles and disappear altogether at smaller zoom levels.

Cheers,

Edward

On 03-02-17 00:31, Dave Blasby wrote:
Hi,

Mapbox vector format is in integer-ized pixel coordinates, so doing more than that wouldn't affect the output.

For the other formats (i.e. geojson), you can use the overSamplingFactor so it gets better resolution.

If you need to change these, you're probably requesting tiles at the wrong resolution for what you're drawing.

Thanks,
Dave

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Edward Mac Gillavry <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi all,

    Although 'Support on the fly geometry simplification' has been turned
    off on the Store, there's still some kind of zoom-dependent
    generalisation going on for vector tiles. Can the amount of
    generalisation be adjusted for each zoom level? Is it the
    overSamplingFactor? Can this be adjusted somehow as well?

    Thanks in advance for your suggestions!

    Cheers,

    Edward

    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
    engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
    _______________________________________________
    Geoserver-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to