This may be a case of the source code being the reference, spending some time with a profiler to identify areas of the code that can be optimized. GML has had a lot more time (both in funding and volunteer effort) optimizing for performance. -- Jody
Jody Garnett On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Thomas Sandor <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I'm using Geoserver: 2.6.0 Build Date 26-Sep-2014 16:00, Java: 8 (1.8.0_20 > (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM)) on Windows 7. If I request some > features from the server (ie. WFS GetFeature service) there is a huge > difference between the response times when I use different output formats. > The default GML output format (GML2/GML3) is very fast, taking 200ms-250ms > to respond for an average request. However the GeoJSON output format > (application/json or jsonp) is taking somewhere 7,1s-7,8s to respond which > is ~30 times slower for the exact same request. Could you please guide me > on where to look for more information on the subject (or any tips to reduce > the json output format response time) or this should be the expected > behaviour? > Best regards: Alex > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
