On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Moules <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> That's definitely sub-optimal. Moving stuff around I could probably
> manage, but it's the fact we'd need about 3 or four stores which are
> identical other than the workspace they're assigned to; as you can imagine
> that's quite redundant.
>
Production wise, the annoying part is replicating the connection pools,
something you can counter if you setup JNDI based ones (there are some
indications in the GeoServer tutorials), because many stores can use the
same connection pool shared by the web container.
> I'm guessing it'd be a significant piece of work to change that?
>
Very much so I'm afraid, it would take a few hours or work just to make an
estimate.
In the past a concept of "Maps", as collection of layers, was discussed,
that would allow to generate virtual OGC services out
of random collection of layers, however it was never implemented due to
lack of funding.
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
