Yes, this issue is still open in our internal JIRA. I have reopened the JIRA
issue on Codehaus and updated it with the possible solution (to introduce a
configurable tag).
Cheers
Rini
From: alessandro marrone [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, 20 April 2012 5:05 PM
To: Angreani, Rini (CESRE, Kensington); Caradoc-Davies, Ben (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Geoserver-users] attribute gml:SignType does not show with
app-schema
I think that this is a huge limitation, this is a problem for elements defined
here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
where could be possible have some empty elements.
Regards
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:47:26 +0800
> Subject: RE: [Geoserver-users] attribute gml:SignType does not show with
> app-schema
>
> If you only map the client property and no values for the element, it will be
> skipped if minOccurs = "0" for the element.
> This was a requirement to skip empty tags with no values (except when
> xlink:href is also specified).
> However, since Alessandro mentioned that he mapped almost everything, this is
> probably not the case.
> If this is the case, we could add an additional tag like <skipIfNull> in the
> AttributeMapping.
> See issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3454.
>
> Cheers
> Rini
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Caradoc-Davies, Ben (CESRE, Kensington)
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 March 2012 5:33 PM
> To: alessandro marrone
> Cc: [email protected]; Angreani, Rini (CESRE,
> Kensington); Justin Deoliveira
> Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] attribute gml:SignType does not show with
> app-schema
>
> We have found some problems with the way the GeoTools encoder handles
> restrictions. I think Rini just submitted a patch for the order of
> properties defined using a restriction, but I don't think I have ever
> tried this with an attribute. Rini?
>
> How are you specifying the value? As a literal? Please ensure that it is
> enclosed on single quotes to ensure that it is not interpreted as a CQL
> expression.
>
> The compiled definition for the GML type looks reasonable. Justin?
>
> On 27/03/12 17:00, alessandro marrone wrote:
> > Hello
> > I'm trying to map this feature:
> > http://xml.fmi.fi/namespace/woml/swo/2011/11/15/index1215.html#id305
> > I mapped almost everything
> > when I map orientation as a client property, the attribute does not appear
> >
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
> Software Engineer
> CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
> Australian Resources Research Centre
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
