We are using Geoserver 2.1 and have noticed a problem with watermarks set in
WMS Settings. Some of our base layers do not change very often and are cached
using the inbuilt GeowebCache. However we are using overlays that change on an
hourly basis (point data from PostGIS). We have found that the scaling of the
watermarks are handled differently for non cached tiles, compared to cached
ones. If both layers are cashed, we end up with large watermarks, in the same
positions. If both layers are not cached, we end up with smaller watermarks,
again in the same position. Using one layer cached and another not cached,
results in both sizes of watermarks in different positions. Is there a way
around this problem?
Take a look - you can pay, report, request, have your say and find information
online at www.wrexham.gov.uk.
Save paper - think before you print!
This e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the individual
or organisation to whom it is addressed. For full conditions in relation to
content and use of this e-mail message and any attachments, please refer to
http://www.wrexham.gov.uk/top_navigation/disclaimers.htm.
Mae'r neges e-bost hon ac unrhyw atodiadau wedi eu bwriadu ar gyfer yr unigolyn
neu?r sefydliad y?i cyfeirir atynt yn unig.
Am yr amodau llawn ynglyn a chynnwys a defnyddio?r neges e-bost hon ac unrhyw
atodiadau, cyfeiriwch at
http://www.wrecsam.gov.uk/top_navigation/disclaimersw.htm.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
tools developers use with it.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
