On Sunday 14 February 2010 11:32:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial > > > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably > > > the majority, won't be flaged at all. > > > > so does cfg-update.... > > Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - > and I give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and > always go back to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with > it, I just prefer (or am used to) conf-update. > > I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I > would welcome it with open arms though.
I'm still using etc-update, which seems adequate except when squid is upgraded, but I thought I'd try cfg-update. Problem though: it demands dev-util/xxdiff which doesn't exist. What's a suitable substitute? -- Rgds Peter.
