Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:

> I would like to point out that this is 'gentoo user' not 'talk about any os' 
> or 'windows support'. You might be surprised to learn that gentoo is a linux 
> distribution. So why do you bring windows or apple up?

Because most of those "millions of users" you were refering to are using
 windows and macos... I met a non-sensical argument with another, as I
see it. Gentoo users are hardly millions (although I don't have any
figures to back that claim up).

> the problems, dbus solves, have been discussed to death already. Maybe you 
> should read Alan McKinnons mails again. You seem to have missed a lot. Neil 
> Bothwick's mails are also something you should consider.

I have read them all. Again, this is just a matter of opinion; you, Alan
and Neil thinks it solves a problem which I don't see. IPC has been
working for decades before D-Bus came along it. It just adds another
layer (the D-Bus protocol) on top of, for example, unix domain sockets
(which is one variant of IPC).

For the record I do have D-Bus installed because it's a compile-time
requirement for Audacious but I don't run the daemon (Audacious works
fine without it). It just sits there taking up space... Which I find
annoying. But again this discussion is pointless since the Audacious
programmers have introduced this (compilation) dependency. So if I wish
to go back to the way it was (before D-Bus) I'd better get hacking! ;-)

So let's agree that we disagree on this matter? :-)

Best regards

Peter K

Reply via email to