On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Christian Apeltauer wrote: > Am Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:18:42 +0000 > > schrieb Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk>: > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:15 -0600, Roy Wright wrote: > > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find > > > another desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 > > > years). > > > > It's so mandatory it takes a whole mouse click to turn it off :( > > If you do not want a piece of software, why should you install it? > Installing and not using it instead of not installing it at all, is the > wrong way and (to my opinion) it is defintely not the Gentoo way. > Well, I have drawn the conclusions and got rid of kmail and am on the > verge of migrating the whole desktop. I loved kde-3.5, I seriously > tried kde-4.*, but I could never befriend with it. And one point I > detaste is that "Social Semantic Desktop" thing (as Nepomuk is > characterized on its afore mentioned wikipedia page). For me it is just > another instance of what Kant called "selbstverschuldete > Unmündigkeit" (self-incurred immaturity).
sure. Be able to tag and quickly find information is immature. Question, when you have KDE installed and some app pulls in gconf or gvfs - do you throw the same temper tamtrum?
