On Sonntag 06 September 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/06/2009 05:10 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Sonntag 06 September 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 09/06/2009 03:50 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >>> and maybe you should decrapify your config a bit? Namespaces? Seccomp? > >>> Process accounting? no compat vdso? > >>> > >>> You really hate performance, do you? > >> > >> On another note: > >> > >> "Say N here if you are running a sufficiently recent glibc version > >> (2.3.3 or later), to remove the high-mapped VDSO mapping and to > >> exclusively use the randomized VDSO." > >> > >> And digging turned up that it saves about 6-10 instructions per syscall > >> but limits the flexibility. This may be a significant improvement for > >> intensive-IO processes. > >> > >> And about process accounting: > >> > >> "This is generally a good idea, so say Y." > > > > yeah, if you are in a bean counter environment. Nobody else needs it. > > > >> Well, I said Y. > >> > >> And on seccomp: > >> > >> "... If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here." > >> > >> Well, guess what? I'm not on "embedded". > > > > and seccomp is only used by a single project by Andrea Arcangeli. Nobody > > else uses it. He also was the submitter of that feature. > > I've used your .config. I only changed CPU from AMD to Intel Core 2, as > well as the SATA and network drivers. Same problems. > > So it's not a kernel configuration problem. > > And btw, no matter how I configure the kernel, Con's scheduler always > results in a smooth and fluid composited GUI. Bte, are you even using > OpenGL compositing or are you just talking random stuff? :P >
I am using kde's opengl compositing. I use fglrx. And I use a patched xorg- server.
