Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:12:16 -0500, Dale wrote: > > >> I was using gcc 4.3 but switched back to gcc 4.1. I'm not a developer >> and I don't feel right about filing a bug since I can't really tell them >> what is broke but something is wrong somewhere. I have not syncd my >> tree and it was a reinstall of the same version of packages. No config >> files were updated or listed that needs to be updated either. >> Basically, the only difference is the compiler. >> > > File a bug. It's like going to the doctor, you don't have to know what's > wrong, just be able to describe the symptoms. > > >
I'm not sure what to even put. I do believe that gcc is causing problems as far as the code it produces but I have no idea what could cause it. I also have not changed my make.conf file. I only change it when they add some new device or something like that. I think the last change I made was to add kdeprefix. I can't see how it could be anything but gcc but have no clue how it could be either. Looks like I wouldn't be the only person to have this issue. I did notice that I can now compile a kernel. I have not had any errors doing that with the old gcc. Maybe, just maybe I can upgrade to 2.6.29 now. Dale :-) :-)
