>> Or would I be better off using ext3 and converting it to ext4 in a month >> or two? Are there any downsides to converting a fs from ext3 to ext4 in this >> way? > > The downsides are that you'll end up with missing ext4 features that will > only apply to newly created files after the conversion. I recommend to just > be clean about it and use ext4 from the start. > AFAIK this isn't true. You can 'convert' an ext3 filesystem to ext4 using ext4's defrag utility. See http://kernelnewbies.org/Ext4.
-- Software is like sex: it is better when it is free - Linus Torvalds
