On Freitag 23 Januar 2009, Norberto Bensa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:11 PM, James Homuth <ja...@the-jdh.com> wrote: > > I'm getting more than a little irritated with > > its attempts to interfere with my attempts to configuring any program > > with an optional PAM plugin. > > What's so bad/hard about pam that everyone wants to remove it? > > Maybe if you ask for directions you'll end up learning pam. Hiding the > problem under the carpet pretending you're doing the right thing is > not the best you can do.
what is so good/usefull about pam that one shall keep it?
