On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to be that the SWF file design is such that unlike flv files (e.g. as > served by youtube) which can be captured/save directly from browser/tmp > cache, the SWF stream has to be unpacked first. This is necessary to > discover the URL that the video file is being served from. Furthermore, > there may well be cookie style session id issues so that capturing content > from the stream/server requires programming abilities (I have none).
Yeah, I think they can do SSL tunneling of HTTP through RTMP and other fun stuff like that.
