On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage" > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" > > I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been > attempted with these two lines. Would it work better without overlays, > i.e., by commenting these two out? > > Well, doing so (#PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage") I did get a different error message. Same spot, but now Portage tells me: ################## Build debug ################## * * ERROR: app-office/abiword-2.6.4 failed. * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile * environment, line 3299: Called gnome2_src_compile * environment, line 2312: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * emake || die "compile failure" * The die message: * compile failure * * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. * A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/abiword-2.6.4/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/abiword-2.6.4/temp/environment'. * This ebuild used the following eclasses from overlays: * /usr/portage/eclass/alternatives.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/eutils.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/multilib.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/portability.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/gnome2.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/fdo-mime.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/libtool.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/gnome.org.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/gnome2-utils.eclass * /usr/portage/eclass/versionator.eclass * ################## End of build debug ################## Ideas, anyone? Liviu