On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:08:49AM +0200, Penguin Lover David Rioja squawked: > Willie Wong escribi?: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:45:02PM +0200, Penguin Lover David Rioja >> squawked: >> >>> 2.- I created ~/.procmail with the following contents: >>> >>> SHELL=/bin/sh >>> MAILDIR=$HOME/.maildir >>> DEFAULT=$MAILDIR >>> LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log >>> >>> | spamassassin --prefs-file=$HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs >>> >>> >> >> Is that all you have in the recipe? I thought a recipe always begins >> with 0: ? From my procmailrc file: >> >> -----------snip--------------- >> :0fw >> | /usr/bin/spamc >> ----------endsnip------------- >> >> since I use spamc/spamd. f makes it a filter and w waits for the >> filter to finish. >> W >> > Ok, you win :) > > I actually have this on .procmail > > INCLUDERC=$HOME/.spamassassin.rc > > instead of that line. In the file .spamassassin.rc I have: > > :0fw > | spamassassin --prefs-file=$HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Another really stupid question, when you sayin your .procmail file, do you mean $HOME/.procmailrc ? I certainly hope you just have a typo, and not named your file something that procmail does not know is the config file. (Was the ~/.maildir/procmail.log log file created?) I am pretty sure the $HOME in your command should parse properly even if procmail passes control to a subshell, so there shouldn't be any reason why your recipe doesn't work. W -- "It was real. At least, if it wasn't real, it did support them, and as that is what sofas are supposed to do, this, by any test that mattered, was a real sofa. " Sortir en Pantoufles: up 677 days, 13:59
