On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Andrey Vul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Why do you believe that you need HFS+ at all? >> Because I have paths which exceed the HFS limit and lead to >> truncation, in addition to symlinks. Both work incorrectly. >> E.g., >> HFS+ directory name: Garritan Instruments for Finale 2009 >> HFS directory name: Garritan Instruments for Finale > > No problem for UDF! > >> I want my remastered (backup) to look exactly like the original: >> Joliet(or ISO9660:1999) for Windows and HFS+ for OS X. >> > >> > mkisofs supports Apple MAC UDF extensions since Spring 2007. >> UDF != HFS+ > > Correct, but I still see no reason why HFS+ is required. Have you mastered OS X install CD/DVDs using AppleUDF and have them behave identically to HFS+ CD/DVDs? Also, AFAIK UDF doesn't support embedded control characters in files (i.e. Icon\r). > > > Jörg > > -- > EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ > URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily > >
-- Andrey Vul
