David Leverton ha scritto:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:18:42 b.n. wrote:
I am not going to do it because of the treatment I'd be reserved by people
like ciaranm, or you, if I only needed help or disagreed with your opinions.

What on Earth makes you think that?

Your behaviour.
The IRC log posted on the r0bertz blog.

Just two examples.

Volker is certainly not asking for help, and he is not merely "disagreeing", but preaching his gospel of lies at every conceivable opportunity. If you don't do that (which is surely wise in any case) you won't receive the corresponding response.

This is paranoid behaviour.
To think that there is a "hate campaign" about your little software is utterly paranoid. You are not Linux, no Microsoft is doing a "get the facts" campaign on you. Actually, I'm pretty sure >99.999% of world population just doesn't care about your software. :)

That said, I don't agree with everything Volker says (frankly I saw no problem at all with a paludis-only overlay, and I said that before, and I don't think there is a "paludis conspiracy" just like I don't think there is an "anti-paludis conspiracy"), and Volker's tone was not better than yours.

But I'm sure that he talks this way because he's actually concerned about your software and the behaviour of your community. And reading stuff like the IRC logs of ciaranm (and you defending his behaviour) I can't but agree.

None of you was constructive in the discussion. For example, a sub-thread went this way: Volker said Paludis is bloated. You answered "no it's not". He said "yes it is" and then it became a sensless blah-blah "liar-liar". Why don't you just go at your desks, count lines of code/features/memory consuption/executable size/whatever fits your measures of "bloated" and decide numerically what's bloated or not?

Moreover, as I told you some time ago, the only way to shut up lies is *facts*. In software, facts means code. You can take it as, think, a contest. He says Paludis is bloated? Let's compare them, and, in the meantime, let's aggressively reduce memory consumption! Let's modularize it (if it's not already), so everyone can have his pet features without complaining. If it's already modular, let's write the appropriate plugin and tell him "see how easy it was?". Et cetera. When you will have huge, undeniable facts on your side, you won't need to fear any "conspiracy". And if someone still denies them, well, let's make those facts even huger and more solid -that is, go and code again.

That way you not only will win your flamewars with more arguments, but make the life of users better.

m.

Reply via email to