Joerg Schilling ha scritto:
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jörg, you appear to be making a fundamental error of assumption. It looks like you consider that simply because you think this matter important (and in your life it probably IS important), that therefore it must be important in mine. This is not true. In my life, your fight with the cdrkit people is very similar to the fights my 11 year old son and 6 year old stepdaughter have. They keep trying to get me to take sides and utterly and completely fail to comprehend why I do not do so.

If this was really not important to you, why do you send long replies?

Because we want to politely and cheerfully let you understand that this fuss about cdrtools/cdrkit is of interest mostly (if not only) for you here, and that keeping on this is just polluting the mailing list. And pollution on the mailing list is something, instead, we care about.

If cdrkit is slowly rotting, you'll be sure people will start notice it and (a)fix cdrkit (b)migrate back to cdrtools. Code speaks for itself. If it's significantly better, people will use it. So why bother? Just wait for the corpse of your enemy floating on the river. :)

I am trying to ignore the attacks from the people behind cdrkit and I hope that people realize that progress is only in the official project. I however need to inform people correctly when I see incorrect claims on
my projects.

Well, fine, but please recognize that it's better you stop there.

If you like to live with the big number of bugs in the fork, go ahead, but
you only harm yourself.

Probably you are right. Actually I use your cdrecord (just checked now), and I feel happy with it. And I am more than happy than you are working on it. And I thank you a lot, a lot, a lot. But again, Joerg, we just want to record our cds. Please, do not involve us on license catfights on a regular basis.

m.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to