Hi, thanks for recalling of emerge usage

I have set opengl and dri, Xorg seems to see properly agp, but kdm
failed to aquire on it

difference between 3.5 and 4.0, it's that 3.5 even if they fail, they
seems to use it properly by not 4.0

I will wait for another version, more usable

4.0.2 has some disturbing bug, that should be correct in svn now
wait and cross leg for 4.0.3 or 4.0.4 version
How this version don't be disturb for downloading by "Page Not Found"
exception (Error 404 :) )
Ok I get out

See ya

Dale a écrit :
> cypherstrong wrote:
>> Ok I have found why kdm-4.0 don't work
>>
>> They doesn't support seamless login over pam even with nullpassword and
>> nopassword activated !!!
>> I use pamusb with a key, and login won't done without password sets ...
>> I will ask to kde team why ...
>>
>> I have look in kdm.log and I have found another problem
>>
>> (II) Module already built-in
>> (II) Module already built-in
>> (II) Module already built-in
>> (EE) VIA(0): [drm] drmAgpAcquire failed 19
>> expected keysym, got XF86KbdLightOnOff: line 70 of pc
>> expected keysym, got XF86KbdBrightnessDown: line 71 of pc
>> expected keysym, got XF86KbdBrightnessUp: line 72 of pc
>> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
>>  
>>> Warning:          Type "ONE_LEVEL" has 1 levels, but <RALT> has 2
>>> symbols
>>>                   Ignoring extra symbols
>>>     
>> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
>>
>> VIA(0) drmAgepAcquire failed
>>
>> The result is the same between kdm-3.5 and kdm-4.0 except on display
>> speed
>>
>> If I use kdm-4.0, the screen display is really slow, I really think agp
>> is totally disabled, and everything take long time to be show even if I
>> use kde-4.0 or kde-3.5 session
>>
>> Now I have try the same on kdm-3.5, speed is good on kde-4.0 or kde-3.5,
>> I think agp is good on it
>>
>> I have look in Xorg.0.log, dri and agp are well activated
>>
>> What happen ? Did I miss a use option ?
>>
>> opengl and dri are totally activated on my use,
>>
>> perhaps I have to try another drivers for via unichrome ?
>>
>> In kernel, I have disabled AGP for VIA (because i think it's not a via
>> unichrome drivers), and activate DRI for VIA (it's a via unichrome dri
>> drivers)
>>
>> with or without AGP for VIA in kernel, I have the same message on all
>> log, so ...
>>
>> Did you have an idea ?
>>
>>
>>   
>
> I'm not real sure but I do have the USE flag dri in my make.conf. 
> xorg-server is the package that shows it uses it but there may be
> other packages.
>
> To find out if you have a flag enabled or not, you can do a emerge -pv
> <package-name> and then look in the list to see if it is enabled or
> not.  Something like this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -pv xorg-server
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild   R   ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.3.0.0-r5  USE="dri ipv6 nptl
> sdl xorg xprint -3dfx -debug -dmx -kdrive -minimal"
> INPUT_DEVICES="keyboard mouse -acecad -aiptek -calcomp -citron
> -digitaledge -dmc -dynapro -elo2300 -elographics -evdev -fpit
> -hyperpen -jamstudio -joystick -magellan -microtouch -mutouch -palmax
> -penmount -spaceorb -summa -synaptics -tek4957 -ur98 -vmmouse -void
> -wacom" VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia -apm -ark -chips -cirrus -cyrix -dummy
> -epson -fbdev -fglrx -glint -i128 -i740 -i810 (-impact) -imstt -mach64
> -mga -neomagic (-newport) -nsc -nv -r128 -radeon -rendition -s3
> -s3virge -savage -siliconmotion -sis -sisusb (-sunbw2) (-suncg14)
> (-suncg3) (-suncg6) (-sunffb) (-sunleo) (-suntcx) -tdfx -tga -trident
> -tseng -v4l -vesa -vga -via -vmware -voodoo" 0 kB
>
> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
>
> If you have color on yours, red is enabled and blue is disabled.  If
> not color, the flags with the minus sign is front are disabled.  You
> can do a euse -i <flag name> to see a short, very short, description
> of what the flag does or it's use.
>
> If you change make.conf, you can do a emerge -avN world to make sure
> all the needed packages are recompiled with the changes.
>
> I have never seen that error before.  Not real sure what to think
> about it.  Anybody else here have a clue??
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-) 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to