Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Thursday 20 December 2007 02:43:04 Dale wrote: > >> I have had mine showing it needed to recompile gcc for a very long time >> now. There is also a bug for it too. It has been there for a really >> long time. There are hacks to work around the bug but some don't like >> the hack and neither did I. I just omit gcc and do whatever else it says. >> >> It's not a perfect tool but it works, mostly anyway. ;-) >> > > It's not a hack. But anyway.. Do you actually need gcj? Otherwise just > disable > USE=gcj and be done with it... > >
The last I saw was making some sort of links manually. I'll give that -gcj a try tho. Can I just disable it on gcc or does it have to be global? Also, what is it anyway? I did a euse -i gcj but it may as well be greek. Thanks Dale :-) :-)
