On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:38:30 -0200, Raphael wrote:
> I believe that a good solution would be evolving Portage to use > different forms of storage, like databases or even LDAP. In a home > desktop, you could use SQLite, which is light weight. In a Office > enviroment, you could use a larger database, like MySQL or PostgreSQL. > In this second case, it would even make sharing the package list faster, > since the only current method is sharing it over NFS. > > I understand that doing so could bloat Portage dependencies, but > it is, IMHO, a good way to improve its speed. This is an interesting idea. if portage were to use a database, there could be, for instance, a ruby on rails app for a interface! :) -Thufir -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
