On Thursday 25 October 2007, Daniel Iliev wrote:

> Now that the behaviour of "useradd -m xyz" has changed from putting
> the newuser in group "users" ("xyz:users") to putting the user in a
> group with same name ("xyz:xyz") I would appreciate any advice on
> getting the old behavior back or any workaround to achieve the same
> goal - all users should be limited by default at creation time.

Why can't you specify the "-g users" when running useradd?
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to