On Thursday 25 October 2007, Daniel Iliev wrote: > Now that the behaviour of "useradd -m xyz" has changed from putting > the newuser in group "users" ("xyz:users") to putting the user in a > group with same name ("xyz:xyz") I would appreciate any advice on > getting the old behavior back or any workaround to achieve the same > goal - all users should be limited by default at creation time.
Why can't you specify the "-g users" when running useradd? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list