Mick wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2007 05:54, Dale wrote: > > >> I think it is a bug myself. It seems to me that there should be a limit >> of some kind on this file. Maybe a time limit, size limit or >> something. Me, I just hate filing bug reports. I have filed a few but >> only after some serious guru >> said I should. I did go search to see if one had been filed but I >> didn't see one filed. >> > > [snip...] > >> Any thoughts from a serious guru about whether I should file this as a >> bug with Seamonkey or not? >> > > I am not a guru and some would argue I am not serious either, but is there > somewhere in the Mozilla settings how much cache and space for > entries/history it is allowed to use? I am thinking of Opera here which > offers you such fine tuning options. >
Well, I do have cache set to 500Mbs but I did that so that it could cache images and such on web pages. I frequent some sites that have a lot of images and since I am on dial-up, very slow dial-up, I like it to store them locally as much as possible. Over clockers forums is one such site that takes forever to load when I have recently cleared the cache. I think what is needed here is a limit to the downloads.rdf file's size or something to that effect. I can say this, I love that it is now faster. I just wonder how many other people are having this issue and have no clue what is wrong. Dale :-) :-)
