--- Kent Fredric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/10/07, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The last several times I've run glsa-check, it's
> > recommended that I emerge a package that portage
> > claims is already installed on my system:
> >
> > camille ~ # glsa-check -t all
> > This system is affected by the following GLSAs:
> > 200705-03
> > camille ~ # glsa-check -p 200705-03
> > Checking GLSA 200705-03
> > www-servers/tomcat-5.5.23-r1 (5.0.27-r6)
> >
> > camille ~ # emerge -pv www-servers/tomcat
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in
> order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > [ebuild R ] www-servers/tomcat-5.5.23-r1
> USE="doc
> > examples -admin -java5 -source -test" 0 kB
> >
> > Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads:
> 0
> > kB
> >
>
> Its possible ( somehow ) you have dupe/stale
> tomcats lying around.
> You tried
> emerge -C "<www-servers/tomcat-5.5.22"
> just to ensure this?, cos it looks like glsa-check
> sees 5.0.27 somewhere ^^;
>
> strace -e trace=file glsa-check -p 200705-03 2>&1 |
> grep -v
> "\(python\|pym\|pkg\|.py\|.pyc\|.so\|portage\|bin\)"
>
> doesn't seem to list any files 'out of the ordinary'
> which get queried
> for existance by that gtsa-check, so I /assume/ its
> all just portage
> DB.
>
>
> --
> Kent
> ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12,
> 13].each{|x|
> print "enNOSPicAMreil
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>
>
That fixed it. Thank you.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
