On 25 October 2006 16:00, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 14:24 schrieb ext Uwe Thiem: > > I am compiling OOO 2.0.4 currently and am somehow surprised. Checking the > > ebuild shows that it still sets JOBS="1" but it *does* use distcc in my > > setup. At least parts of OOO are compiled on another box. It never did > > that before. Did I misread the ebuild? > > So how is using distcc and jobs=1 contrary? If you have configured portage > to use distcc and have distcc configured to only use the remote machine, no > matter how many jobs yoou start, they will end up on the remote (unless > distcc itself decides it's not worthwhile).
I compiles OOO on both boxes in parallel. Actually, it just finished without error while I was typing this. And yes, the compile run was much faster than any other before. Uwe -- Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective. http://www.SysEx.com.na -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
