Daniel da Veiga wrote: > On 6/30/06, Marco Calviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi list, >> i've recently read this short article on distrowatch: >> >> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060626#news >> >> What about these problems? Someone that's more inside the Gentoo >> decision process, can explain better what's (if it is true) happening? >> > > Well, the guy got the attention he wanted. > If you follow GWN, you can see devs that come to the project, and > others leave, that's only natural, and if you leave a project, you > simply do not post the entire web with reasons that can only be taken > as highly personal and regarding the human relations inside Gentoo > Project. Why aren't the other developers answering? I have only one > guess... They really don't care... The project is going on and see > lots of discussions and improvements at all topics on the mailing > lists and foruns. Gentoo is not dying, not even loosing strenght. Its > growing, and growing is painfull, we all know that. > > Now, distrowatch should pay more attention before posting news that > can lead to misunderstanding, probably the dev that left the project > had better relations inside distrowatch than inside Gentoo development > project ;) > Hi, Don't wanna say anything, but all of you could just search -dev ML-archives. There are two alternate package-managers in development. Some sparks about dev/user overlays,sunrise-overlay,GWN etc. etc. Not seen such turmoil in latest 3 years (and IMHO most things are personal). No flames intended, just info. Rumen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
