First time I ever did this on a mailing list... John Laremore... you are PLONKED... My email filter now drops your emails into the bit bucket where they belong....
On Sunday 28 May 2006 21:03, John Laremore wrote: > quit fucking email bombing me you ass holes. > > > From: Bo ظrsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems > Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:25 +0200 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Received: from robin.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102]) by > bay0-mc2-f10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, > 28 May 2006 15:14:51 -0700 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost > [127.0.0.1])by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id > k4SMD7KS003610;Sun, 28 May 2006 22:13:07 GMT Received: from > cicero2.cybercity.dk (cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53])by > robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4SMALei017832for > <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 28 May 2006 22:10:21 GMT > Received: from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35])by > cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DA9244F08for > <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 +0200 (CEST) > Received: from BA.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk > [212.242.227.17])by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id > 6BB172869D7for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 > +0200 (CEST) > > >Sunday 28 May 2006 21:48 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin: > > > > This change could be a > > > > bugfix. By making your own digest you don't get this bugfix... > > > > > > more probably - the mirror corrupted the file. Or someone replaced it > > > with a hacked package. > > > >While that is possible I'm not really sure why you consider it more > > likely. > > > >At least in my case this bug showed when I upgraded from perl-cleaner-1.03 > > to perl-cleaner-1.03-r1. Those two ebuilds are identical and use the same > > tar file as source. This means that when I originally (a couple of weeks > > ago) installed 1.03 the digest fitted the other, smaller tar file, which > > means that devs has approved both versions of that tar file). It did > > install successfully (and seemed to work) so it couldn't be too > > corrupted. > > > >So while it is possible that the devs approved a file that shouldn't have > > been approved, I prefer to think that upstream just did something stupid > > by upgrading the package without a revision bump.. :) > > > >-- > >Bo Andresen > > > ><< attach3 >> > > Join the new Messenger beta now -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
