On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Bruce Burden wrote:
>
> > Is it in the portage system? I did a "sync" a few weeks
> > ago, and I still get the 20050502 version,
>
> Do an 'eix x11-drm' and see it lists a 20051223 version, keyword
> masked. (If you don't have eix, first run 'emerge eix' and
> 'update-eix'.) So do
>
> echo "x11-base/x11-drm ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords
>
> and 'emerge x11-drm'.
>
Okay, I have:
* x11-base/x11-drm
Latest version available: 20051223
Latest version installed: 20051223
Size of downloaded files: 549 kB
Homepage: http://dri.sf.net
Description: DRM Kernel Modules for X11
License: X11
* x11-drivers/ati-drivers
Latest version available: 8.14.13-r3
Latest version installed: 8.14.13-r3
Size of downloaded files: 23,186 kB
Homepage: http://www.ati.com
Description: Ati precompiled drivers for r350, r300, r250 and r200
chipsets
License: ATI
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
radeon 98464 0
drm 61592 1 radeon
agpgart 27216 1 drm
bluetooth 39652 0
libcrc32c 2816 0
crc_ccitt 2176 0
and nothing in /dev/dri, which may explain:
(II) fglrx(0): UMM area: 0xc08f7000 (size=0x076f9000)
(II) fglrx(0): driver needs X.org 6.8.x
(II) fglrx(0): detected X.org 6.8.2
(II) Loading extension ATIFGLRXDRI
(II) fglrx(0): doing DRIScreenInit
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
[drm] failed to load kernel module "fglrx"
(II) fglrx(0): [drm] drmOpen failed
(EE) fglrx(0): DRIScreenInit failed!
(WW) fglrx(0): ***********************************************
(WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed! *
(WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) *
(WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO) *
(WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available *
(WW) fglrx(0): ********************************************* *
(this is from /var/log/Xorg.0.log)
and, finally:
[fglrx:firegl_stub_register] *ERROR* Unable to the open some already present
DRM kernel module!
So, what am I doing wrong?
The drm module seems to be the problem child, once I added that, fglrx got
tempermental...
Bruce
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I like bad!" Bruce Burden Austin, TX.
- Thuganlitha
The Power and the Prophet
Robert Don Hughes
--
[email protected] mailing list