On 15 Jan 2006, at 14:36, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Sunday 15 January 2006 04:08, Stroller wrote:
I'd be very happy with a 95% success rate on spam detection, but
obviously false positives are a Bad Thing.
Never tried it myself, but I've read many articles that say that
dspam is
a better filter than spamassassin, ...
http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/
It does indeed seem very good, but again it requires training, which
is something I'm trying to avoid in this instance.
Stroller.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
