I understand that anyone with "~x86" in make.conf would get an upgrade like that. I used to run one box bleeding edge but had a portage/perl issue about a year and a half ago that took a couple days to fix. That cured my need for the latest and greatest of everything. Now, I run a few "~x86" apps but I don't really know enough to go all the way.
On Thursday 22 December 2005 17:58, a tiny voice compelled Neil Bothwick to write: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:32:43 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote: > > Just for fun, why would one want to emerge an unstable bash? Is there > > some feature that I "have to have"? > > No, but I run pure ~arch systems. When I updated world on my iBook, a > bash update was included, so I let it run. I then rebooted and none of > my init scripts showed errors. It appears that others weren't so lucky > and that version is now hard-masked. -- Regards, Ernie 100% Microsoft and Intel free 23:37:28 up 2 days, 12:42, 4 users, load average: 0.05, 0.09, 0.19 Linux 2.6.14-gentoo-r42.6.14-r-4_new i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
