To be more realistics you have to compite in equal conditions, compiling in ram for example. Maybe your harddisk is faster that his one.

8  dd if=/dev/urandom to ram would be fine IMO


El 24/7/25 a las 14:50, Michael escribió:
On Thursday, 24 July 2025 12:16:21 British Summer Time Alexandru N. Barloiu
wrote:
On Thu, 2025-07-24 at 11:48 +0100, Michael wrote:
Please post how long it takes you to emerge qtwebengine, rust,
libreoffice.

sorry, i dont use any of that. best i can do is:




[root@trandafira:~]# genlop -t sys-devel/gcc
  * sys-devel/gcc

      Fri Jun  6 00:24:16 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-14.3.0
        merge time: 10 minutes and 50 seconds.

      Fri Jun  6 00:57:02 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-15.1.0
        merge time: 15 minutes and 24 seconds.




which is odd. and wrong. i can brag about it. but the truth is, it
should be around 20 minutes.


      Fri Jun  6 03:08:48 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-15.1.0
        merge time: 22 minutes and 41 seconds.

      Sat Jun  7 12:08:11 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-14.3.0
        merge time: 21 minutes and 43 seconds.

      Sat Jun  7 21:46:39 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-15.1.0
        merge time: 22 minutes and 24 seconds.

      Sat Jun  7 22:55:58 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-14.3.0
        merge time: 21 minutes and 25 seconds.

      Wed Jul  9 19:01:53 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-15.1.1_p20250705-r1
        merge time: 22 minutes and 36 seconds.


with LTO on. should say. ignore the 10/15 minutes one. prolly a bug.
but gcc with lto never lies because its not about distcc. its about
your own system. those are the times. no BS times.

Thank you for this.  I don't use distcc.  On an AM4 MoBo with DDR4 I get 29%
slower times if I enable LTO when emerging gcc, which is to be expected.

      Thu Jun  5 11:40:53 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-14.3.0
        merge time: 17 minutes and 22 seconds.

      Thu Jul 24 12:55:07 2025 >>> sys-devel/gcc-14.3.0
        merge time: 24 minutes and 14 seconds.

Compared to your LTO times my PC is ~12% slower, which is surprising.  I was
expecting yours would show a ~25% improvement.  I wonder what performance
boost you'd get with the new AMD V-cache driver in the kernel and if this
would be realisable by a compiler.  o_O

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x57E64E0B7FC3BEDF.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to