Michael wrote: > > I'm not the best person to advise on LVM, I just shared what I know, but I > haven't used LVM in anger for a few years now. Hopefully someone with more > hands on experience will chime in.
Since the lv command worked, I don't think this is a LVM problem. That part of the growth is there. It seems to be resize2fs that has the problem. I just wonder, if I could do a file system check, would it work then? Thing is, it to wants it unmounted. It makes me wonder if there is something that needs to be fixed, even if it is minor and not a actual data problem, but it isn't just saying the file system needs to be fixed first. When I did my searches, most people had a part in the output about a bad super block or that a super block wasn't found. Mine doesn't have that tho. I'm not sure what difference that makes. I'll try to boot some media and do it I guess. Just not today. Dale :-) :-)
