On 11/13/24 10:14 AM, Michael wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 November 2024 15:12:06 GMT Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> The recommended replacement was nss-pam-ldapd.
>>
>> You can keep using pam_ldap if you prefer, from a local overlay.
> 
> The wiki suggests 'sys-auth/sssd' as a more recent alternative:


Sure. sssd is a good idea for a modern replacement for configuring LDAP
users. But nss-pam-ldapd might be considered more desirable for previous
users of pam_ldap who are looking for a replacement that is relatively
equivalent, particularly in terms of being lightweight.

My gut feeling is that anyone who wanted to use pam_ldap in the first
place would rather avoid sssd if it's possible to use nss-pam-ldapd.
Personally, I would just use sssd, but that is me personally...


-- 
Eli Schwartz

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to