Stroller wrote:
Do you have any references on this, please? I'm obviously using different search terms from you, because I can't find anything about this bug on Google.
search term: bug "lspci -F" "0000:" ... brings us to: http://www.google.ch/search?q=bug+%22lspci+-F%22+%220000%3A%22+ ... where hit number 3 leads us to: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/pciutils/pciutils_2.1.11-15.1/changelog ... which says: * fix lspci -F for new or old lspci -x format (closes: #261536) based on patch by Ben Pfaff ... where #261536 is a link to: http://bugs.debian.org/261536
I've just run esync & am only offered the same version of pciutils that I already have - 2.1.11-r5. If you can provide a link to the pciutils bug then I'll request a version bump with b.g.o. (I'd also like to know more about this so I can advise my customers, should I request a `lspci -x` output from them).
The newest release is still masked by keyword. To unmask: # mkdir -p /etc/portage # echo sys-apps/pciutils ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords # emerge -avt sys-apps/pciutils Christoph -- echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
