On Thursday, 6 February 2020 13:44:22 GMT k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Mick: > ... > > > I don't have these packages on my systems to check, but does 'eselect > > lapack list' reveal anything amiss? > > ... > > $ eselect lapack list > Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: > (none found) > Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: > (none found) > $ eselect blas list > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: > (none found) > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: > (none found) > > and after rebuilding lapack with eselect-ldso > > $ eselect lapack list > Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: > (none found) > Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: > [1] reference * > $ eselect blas list > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: > (none found) > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: > [1] reference * > > still same problem. > > recompiling octave, same problem. > recompiling octave with static-libs, same problem. > > Regards, > /Karl Hammar
Unless someone shows up with more knowledge on the specifics it would be worth posting a bug, or contacting the maintainer for suggestions. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
