On 9/27/05, fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems that on two of my machines, after recent updates, I no > > longer have /dev/cdroms and therefore cannot mount CDs, etc. I can > > mount them by hand using the old style /dev/hda. The hardware works. > > It just seems that udev is now doing something different. > > > > Has anyone else seen this of late? > > > > I am set up as "auto" for the udev/devfs choice in /etc/conf.d/rc, > > as well as not using a tarball. udev is up and running: > > > > gigastudio ~ # ps aux | grep udev > > root 854 0.0 0.0 1468 484 ? S<s 10:30 0:00 udevd > > gigastudio ~ # > > > > gigastudio ~ # emerge -pv udev > > > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies ...done! > > [ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-068-r1 [068] (-selinux) -static 0 kB > > > > Total size of downloads: 0 kB > > gigastudio ~ # > > > > Any ideas why this might happen and where I'd look to solve the problem? > > > > All machines have been rebooted, etc. > > > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > > I saw this too, with udev-070. I tried everything I could to rule out it > being udev, but I was unable to do so. I filed a bug, it would help if > you could provide your details there. > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107142 > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > >
Done. In my case the drives are there and working, but the /dev/ names are more old style. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls /dev/cdr cdrom cdrom1 cdrw cdrw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls /dev/cdrom /dev/cdrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -al /dev/cdrom lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Sep 27 00:52 /dev/cdrom -> hda [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -al /dev/cdrom1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Sep 27 00:52 /dev/cdrom1 -> hdb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -al /dev/cdrw lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Sep 27 00:52 /dev/cdrw -> hda [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -al /dev/cdrw1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Sep 27 00:52 /dev/cdrw1 -> hdb [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Everything is working except I'd have to change fstab to make it easy. Thought I'd ask if there was a known change about udev naming that I hadn't heard about. Thanks, Mark -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
