James <wirel...@tampabay.rr.com> [15-07-29 19:46]:
>  <Meino.Cramer <at> gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > 
> > J. Roeleveld <joost <at> antarean.org> [15-07-29 16:38]:
> > > On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 05:18:25 AM Meino.Cramer <at> gmx.de wrote:
> 
> > > Is this speed between both machines? Or to the internet?
> 
> Joost is exactly correct here. Test the links one connection at
> a time, not just all a once. You'll be able to get a 'sit of pants' feeling
> about the capabilities on each link (between devices). There are many many
> issues so let's first characterize each link by the bandwith.
> 
> 
> On ethernet interfaces this is a really cool tool::
> 
>  net-analyzer/bwmon   and net-analyzer/nbwmon
> 
> > I fired up create_ip like this (just for testing and haveing at least
> > ONE experienced succes with this Wifi stuff...):
> > 
> > create_ap wlan0 eth1 <name> <pass>
> > 
> > How can I check for the type of WIFI after the connection has been
> > established?
> 
> 'ip link'   and  'netstat -nr' are a good start. Later on we'll get
> you some gui tools and a monitoring software (a ton of options)...
> 
> 
> > USB is USB 2.0
> > 
> > The speed is measured by conky, which reads the transfer rate at eth0.
> > At that tome, the tablet was getting a greater piece of tar archive
> > (LInux for Android) and no other traffic other than this was there.
> > The DSL was by far not saturated.
> 
> Really?  How do you know. It take lots of experimenting and testing
> and data collection over time to figure our exactly what your 
> ISp(s) are doing. Usually several ISPs are in a link until you hit
> a 'peering point'    
> 
> 'net-analyzer/traceroute'
> 
> is your friend. At some point the ISPs will block traceroute info....
> 
> 
> > So physically it is the speed of the internet but logically it is
> > nearly identical to what happens at the Wifi interface (I think).
> > I will check for an app which displays the speed measured on the
> > tablets interface...
> 
> This is a very, very complicated issue. ISP(s) use devices to deliver
> and partition bandwidth; some with an incredible level of control
> (granularity). For instances they can 'port constrict' a service
> or a route to an endpoint or any number of things. So first fully 
> study (characterize) the behavior of the links (connnections between
> devices) that you manage and develop that 'seat of pants' feeling about the
> network segments you manage. Then start sniffing up the outside folks,
> as best you can with the tools in the portage tree.....(many).
> 
> 
> You need to also understand that Usb has it's own problems, protocols and
> issues depending on how it was implemented by the chipsets use and the
> firmware inside the product. Other protocol (latencies and such) are layered
> on top of that.  Ju are 'full stack' wheelin and dealing as soon
> as your run gui apps across that link.........brau.
> 
> 
> > Best regards,
> > Meino
> 
> ttfn,
> Always your pal!
> James
> 

Hi James,

:)

The solution was as simple as follows:

I did this:

./create_ap wlan0 eth1 <name> <pass>

and I was happy to have my first access point created...
that one which seems to use morse code to transfer data.
That was yesterday evenining.
The I heard of different protocols from which one was
old and slow and others speedy and "newer"

Then I did this (a few miniutes ago):
./create_ap --ieee80211n wlan0 eth1  <name> <pass>

And TADA! the internet transfer rate measured with conky
(as mentioned before) jumps from 80Kb/sec up to the most
my DSL can delver (which is not that much, since I have 
choosen a cheap low end of transfer rates possible from
my DSL provider. NOW the linux installation on my Android
tablet show real progress (and fails for other reasons,
I currently dont have figured out).

I am happy with the result - except for the non working
Linux installation, which is another problem...unfortunately
I dont speak a single word Russian and the forum of the
Android Installation tool is Russian spoken...

We will see, James.

Thank you very much for your detailed help!!! 8)

Best regards,
Meino








Reply via email to