Tom H <tomh0...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:57 AM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:41 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> I can't even read them on a working system. >>> >>> If that's true (which I highly doubt, more probably you don't know how to >>> read them), then it's a bug and should be reported and fixed. >> >> I read log files with less. The bug is that systemd uses some sort of >> binary files, and they aren't going to fix it. They even won't fix >> their misunderstanding of what "disabled" means. So why make bug >> reports? > > The systemd developers' use of disable/mask isn't wrong simply because > you disagree with them.
No, it's wrong because they don't know what "disabled" means. Feel free to look into dictionaries and to examine the use of the word "disabled" in it's language to find out what it means. -- Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonable.
