On 24/06/2014 19:32, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> [14-06-24 19:12]: >> On 24/06/2014 16:43, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I bought two identical external harddrives, USB 3.0, with 1 TByte each >>> (no SSD - the good ole mechanical ones...;). >>> >>> The intended use is for backup of longer files. The drives will >>> contain the same contents. >>> >>> Currently there are still "clean metal" (no partitioning, no fs). >>> >>> Data integrity and recoverability (Uhhh...that words looks wrong...) in >>> case of an desaster is more important than speed. >>> >>> What is the recommended way of partitioning ? >>> What filesystem to choose? >>> >>> >>> Thank you very much in advance for any help! >>> Best regards, >>> mcc >>> >>> >>> PS: Running vanilla kernel 3.15.1.... >> >> You haven't given much in the way of detail, so I assume you have >> regular needs, nothing fancy, and it's all a bunch of files right? >> >> In that case, partitioning and filesystem type are largely irrelevant as >> long as you don't have corruption. With one caveat: >> >> You must always make sure the source drive is intact and ok. If not, and >> you back it up anyway, then you are already toast (you will overwrite >> your last backup with new faulty data). >> >> There's several approaches to how to do the transfer: >> >> If you have say a general fileserver with lots of files that don't >> change much or often, just rsync everything in one go. There is no >> optimization you can do that will perform much faster than rsync. >> >> If you have a big busy filesystem that changes often and lots, then use >> lvm (or anything that can make snapshots) and rsync that. >> >> If you have a huge database where everything is changing all the time, >> don't do filesystem copies, use the tools provided by the db vendor. I >> doubt this is your need as you would have said so, but it's worth >> mentioning. >> >> >> -- >> Alan McKinnon >> alan.mckin...@gmail.com >> >> > > Hi Alan, > > thanks for your reply! :) > > Yes...your are right. I have a lot static (=not changing) data on my > harddisk...mostly things like video tutorials (blender), videos of > birds I filmed, dokuments and such... > > They are eating up the space on my systems harddisk. > > Do I decided to put them on a extern hd and an identical copy on > another identical external harddisk. > > Its mainly a task of updateing the data on the external drives with > that what is new (and static and big and falls under what I described > above) on my systems harddisk. > > I will check rsync for that!
That changes things just a little bit - I thought your two drives were going to be one for live and one for backup. Do you intend to move these files off your main drive onto the identical externals, or just copy the files? I would have those two external drives using different filesystems, just in case as they are your only copy and external drives are fragile in use and in storage. Exact fs type doesn't really matter - ext4 and xfs, or ext* and btrfs, it's all good. Just do make sure you don't use rsync with --delete for this :-) -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
