> On May 21, 2014, at 13:33, Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:02:46 -0400
> Hunter Jozwiak <hunter.t....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all. I made the following in /etc/portage/make.conf
>> #ACCEPT_LICENS="*"
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
>> Save and exit.
>> To double check, I ran:
>> #emerge --info | grep -i accept
>> ACCEPT_LICENSES="* -@EULA"
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
>> The way it looks, the file just appended what I want to the Portage
>> default. As far as the keywords variable is concerned, that will cause
>> issues. Do I need to negate the defaults with the -?
>
> ACCEPT_LICENSES is commented out; so, yes, it'll use the default.
>
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS I think that ~x86 includes, similar to how maintainers
> specify KEYWORDS="x86" and not KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" in their ebuilds;
> I'm not entirely sure, but I think that would be the case.
>
> You can check with something like ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~x86"
> which might result in something that lists all the stable ones as well.
>
> Negating x86 with - could be a possible solution; however, I wonder if
> that's what you want as some packages have only stable versions.
>
> --
> With kind regards,
>
> Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
> Gentoo Developer
>
> E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
> GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
> GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
I commented that out for the purposes of having it in the email as a sort of
example. It isn't actually commented I was in the file. So having the x86 and
the ~x86 in the same variable would make a safe portage solution?
