On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 2014-02-19 2:04 AM, Daniel Campbell <li...@sporkbox.us> wrote: >> >> For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be chosen as >> the default. > > Ridiculous. Forget about Canek's rant... > > This is about *choice*. Also, I would argue the *opposite of what Canek is > saying in this last rant...
Tanstaafl, can we please not use terms like "rants"? I'm just giving my opinion, trying to be respectful and civil to the others participants in this thread. I would appreciate if you do the same to me. > If he and other want systemd profiles, let *them* do the work of creating > and maintaining them. And as I said on [1], I agree; lets have a systemd profile... which apparently it basically already exists[2]. (I snip the rest, since I don't really disagree with it). Regards. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/272694 [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/systemd/ -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
