On 21/10/13 08:31, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 10/20/2013 09:34 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote >> >>> That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but >>> from top of my head: >>> We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts the offending code. >>> >>> As in, that's nothing to be worried about before it happens. >> That's not always possible, e.g. GNOME 3.8. >> > I think that's an exception to the rule. I mean, upstream deliberately > chose to depend on systemd/logind and whatnot. In such a situation > there's literally no way to fix it without a fork, and I doubt Gentoo as > an organization is interested in that. >
well said
